Greenhouse Pollution Reduced by Natural Gas

| Impact on greenhouse gases reduced with LNG over coal power generation greenhouse computer pollution to type on reduced numbers natural greenhouse figure pollution keys gas text natural in letters keyboard gas paragraph greenhouse create pollution colors code software gas eh reduced pollution color greenhouse or natural up reduced || global warming climate strategic electricity generation environmental shale oil energy emissions || emissions energy oil shale environmental electricity strategic climate warming global || emissions company energy reduce oil power study methane development ghg community leakage producing global studies information companies shale production plants giving local communities spirit operations worldwide fact share states united industry flaring sustainable questions resources water innovative market produce magazine libya brunei timor-leste australia china indonesia malaysia qatar norway colombia canada alaska standards data agency protection environmental wells joined generation electricity analysis strategic institute joint published liquids university year areas plan venting change climate technology releases warming compared estimates common contact presentations corporate search career locations reporting impact seekers grant employee education math stewardship biodiversity working safely cooperation business solutions creating exploring find explore legacy sheets exploration independent || independent exploration sheets legacy explore find exploring creating solutions business cooperation safely working biodiversity stewardship math education employee grant seekers reporting locations career search corporate presentations contact common estimates compared warming releases technology climate chang venting plan areas year university liquids published joint institute strategic analysis electricity generation joined wells environmental protection agency data standards alaska canada colombia norway qatar malaysia indonesia china australia timor-leste brunei libya magazine produce market innovative water resources questions sustainable flaring industry united states share fact worldwide operations spirit communities local giving plants production shale companies information studies global producing leakage community ghg development methane conocophillips study power oil reduce energy company emissions || impact ||

ELECTRON PUSHER

E10 Ethanol Fuel Claim is a Lie

  Oil companies and governments are not telling us the truth ethanol lie alternative truck vehicle traditional gasoline ethanol heavy lie taxes europe environmental laws california greenhouse ethanol fuel lie emissions high priority manufacturers ethanol fuel lie current electric internal combustion forms ethanol it fuel on lie focus cells gdi hcci ethanol engines lie possible long-term economical advantages fossil natural renewable resource ethanol occurs nature whenever solution hybrid uses fuel multiple propulsion systems motive.
The conservational properties of E10 ethanol fuel for motor vehicles is a myth. If you have a medium sized car, say 2 litres in engine size, driving carefully your car will travel 100 kilometers on 10 liters of regular 91 octane petrol.  It is well known that E10 is inefficient in regards to performance and economy. You will not get 100 kilometers out of 10 liters of ethanol-blend. About 90 kilometers would be the distance.

What does this mean? To get 100 kilometers out of E10 will take 10 per cent more of the novel substance. Your car would use 11 liters of ethanol-blend. Normal 91 octane petrol makes up 90 per cent of E10-mix, so how much 91 petrol are you using to travel 100 kilometers?

  fuel

The answer is here:

            0.9 x 11 liters = 9.9 liters of 91

            Rounding this up to a whole number we get 10.00 liters.

The 10 per cent added ethanol in E10 is doing nothing at all. It is just an "extender" - a thinning agent. Petrol remains the one and only substance powering your car.

   lie

Benefit to the environment is zero. Carbon is still pumped into the atmosphere at the same rate whether you use the magical, wonderful Ethanol-blend or standard 91 octane. You use your car in a habitual way: driving to work, the shops, family weekends. No matter what you choose to put in your car you still cover the same distance.

It doesn't even make sense for oil companies to sell the stuff.  They make less profit than selling ordinary gas.  At first they thought they would make a lot of money but they were wrong.  Politicians are a stupid bunch.  They live in ivory towers insulated from the real world. Making silly regulations forcing the wrong things on people is their game.

Don't believe all the hype. It is the great ethanol-mix fraud!

Note: Remember the hype given to diesel cars, how they were efficient and ran clean?  This is now found to be wrong.  Some countries are now banning such vehicles.  Diesel has always been a filthy substance.  Many people have known all along that clean diesel engines was rubbish - literally.

◆ Transport ◆

Tys Country
Amusing Animal Photos
Odd Weird Things
Articles News Reviews

●

Vista Computer Answers

 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS FRAUD

forgotten seat lady

Elecric Cars are a Mistake

Adopting battery powered cars is the worst thing societies can do. It is just a transfer from dirty oil engines to dirty oil power station. Removal of carbon at power stations is talked about a lot. However, nothing has been achieved. Experiments have largely failed.

The distance barrier is still a problem for battery cars. To go more than two hundred miles requires an enormous battery, far to heavy to put in vehicles. Price is still an issue: there is little hope of a reduction even with mass production. Weak demand continues.

Planners are saying that the lack of battery "charge" centers is the main barrier. This is only secondary. Where does the capital come from to build them? Battery swap stations were established by the Electric Light Company to service a fleet of electric trucks a century ago. Buses in China get new batteries en route. The trucks disappeared and Chinese buses are government run.

Changing to a recharged battery is not cost effective. If you have to do this you may as well keep the petrol car. A charge-up at home is the only way to go. Long distance truckers will never adopt battery power. There is little torque in the powertrain, certainly not enough to transport heavy goods.

✴ Transport Transport by Ty Buchanan ✴

http://www.adventure--australia.blogspot.com/

http://www.tysaustralia.blogspot.com/

http://adventure--australia.blogspot.com/atom.xml

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Vista Computer Solutions Blog 

     Australian Blog★                         
ALL BLOG ARTICLES· ──► (BLOG HOME PAGE)